Parsing subway rides with gtfs-tripify



A few years ago there was a massive push, spearheaded by Google, to unify the systems that various public transit systems used for external reporting. For many years (decades?) public mass transit operators in the United States had been reporting data on the trains and buses they operated, but every system had its own configuration, leading to a painful morass of incompatibility. Google studied the problem and invented a specification eventually known as the "General Transit Feed", or GTFS, as a solution. Years of robust technical evangelism by both Googlers and a loose consortium of civic activists eventually toppled bureaucracy, and today GTFS is a global standard. The spec is a rare victory for standardization in government data.

New York City's transit authority, the MTA, publishes GTFS data. It also publishes what are called GTFS-Realtime feeds. GTFS-Realtime is the future of mass transit. GTFS-Realtime provides a snapshot of where every train (or bus) in the system is located and where it's planning to go next. Hence GTFS-Realtime is a big step up from GTFS because it provides ground truth about how the system is operating.

If you live in New York City and take the train to work you probably have some sort of train and/or bus application on your phone. You're also probably familiar with the widely popular countdown clocks that are now installed in almost every station. GTFS-Realtime exposes this same data to consumer applications!

The New York City Transit System is enormous, so the GTFS-Realtime rollout has been incremental. The first lines to receive feeds were the 1 through the 6 and the S. Further progress was slow until early 2017, when the MTA mass-installed WiFi in every underground station in New York City. This paved the way for a clever hack: wireless transmitters were installed in most trains, which, whenever the train pulled into a stop, would ping control towers to indicate where the train was. By bootstrapping these transmitters across the entire fleet, between December 2016 and today the city was able to launch GTFS-Realtime coverage for every line in the entire subway system. Huzzah!

In this post I will first describe the salient points of the GTFS-Realtime standard and how it is utilized by the MTA. Then, I'll discuss the challenges of parsing real-world GTFS-Realtime snapshot data into a format that's less useful for commercial applications, but more useful for research and metrics purposes: historical train arrival tables. Finally, I'll present a brand-new Python package, gtfs_tripify, for constructing such data.

Working with GTFS-Realtime

The GTFS-Realtime specification defines a set of fields of expected values using a format known as Protobuf. Protobuf is a Google-developed interface description language for data serialization. You start by creating a specification, known as a Proto file. You then feed this specification to Protobuf, which turns around and churns out an API working with such data.

GTFS-Realtime feed is defined in this way by a publicly available gtfs-realtime.proto file. You could use this file to generate your own GTFS-Realtime API. But Google publicly distributes ready-made APIs in a variety of programming languages, so it's easiest to just grab one of those from their GitHub.

There's an interesting caveat here. The MTA doesn't use the official GTFS-Realtime proto file. They use a version of the specification that they've extended with a few additional data fields. You can get their version here. I will keep going with the "vanilla" GTFS-Realtime API, which can still be used to read MTA data but will "miss out" on these bonus fields, because the additional information was relatively unimportant and added unnecessary complexity.

Pouring data into a Python object using the Protobuf API is easy, albeit rather funky. Here's a code bit for reading a single timestamped feed into memory:

# Request some archived GTFS-Realtime feeds.
import requests
response = requests.get('')

# Load the data into an object using the default API.
from google.transit import gtfs_realtime_pb2
feed = gtfs_realtime_pb2.FeedMessage()

The resulting feed contains a header with identifying information (most importantly, the timestamp), and a payload list of "messages". Each "message" represents a chunk of data about the state of the system. In the MTA feeds, there are three kinds of messages. The first type is the vehicle update, which provides information about where a vehicle currently is on the track:

  trip {
    trip_id: "006550_1..N02X003",
    start_date: "20170621",
    route_id: "1"
  current_stop_sequence: 4,
  current_status: "INCOMING_AT",
  timestamp: 1498022005,
  stop_id: "137N"


There are three possible current_status codes. A train which is "INCOMING_AT" is almost at a station (and should be fully stopped at it within the next minute), while a train that is "EN_ROUTE_TO" is going somewhere, but still between stops. The last possible value, "STOPPED_AT", is pretty self-explanatory. The timestamp is the UNIX timestamp at which the feed was valid.

Notice that the stop_id is not the official name of the station, but an identifying ID. The official names and locations of the stops can be read out of stops.txt in the corresponding GTFS feed. The interesting thing about stop_id is that it includes the heading of the train in the station name: "N" for northbound, "S" for southbound. While most trains in New York City are dominantly north-south, a few run mainly east-west. In those cases the MTA does the logical thing and...converts west to north, and east to south. Oh right, that's actually terrible.

The second type of message is the trip update:

    "trip": {
        trip_id: "006550_1..N02X003",
        start_date: "20170621",
        route_id: "1"
    "stop_time_update": {
        "arrival": {
          "time": 1498021800
        "departure": {
          "time": 1498021800
        "stop_id": "137N"
        "stop_time_update" {
        "arrival" {
          "time": 1498023750
        "departure" {
          "time": 1498023750
        "stop_id": "224N"
        "stop_time_update" {
        "arrival" {
          "time": 1498023990
    "stop_id": "301N"

A pretty easy read. The trip bit is basically a foreign key that lets you link this update up with the co-requisite vehicle update. The first stop in the sequence will contain only an departure estimate if the train is currently STOPPED_AT there, while the last stop in the sequence will contain only an arrival.

The third and last type is an alert. An alert message provides (textual) information about a delay for some selection of affected trips. The text itself is usually of dubious usefulness.

    "alert": [
            "trip" {
                "trip_id": "006550_1..N02X003",
                "route_id": "1"
    "header_text" {
        "translation" {
            "text": "Train delayed"

Alerts are important for consumer applications, but since I'm interested in historical data I didn't spend much time worrying about them.

Trip updates and vehicle updates make up the core "state" in the feed. Vehicle updates usually follow their associated trip updates in tight one-two order: so you expect to see Trip A Trip Update, Trip A Vehicle update, Trip B Trip Update, Trip B Vehicle Update, and so on. Alerts would go at the very end of the feed, after all trips and vehicles have been exhausted.

Trips that are scheduled but which have not yet started are the exception. The MTA prepends the GTFS-Realtime feed with trip updates for trips that have not yet started, but which are scheduled to occur. This is done because if you are located at a station at or very near the beginning of a line, the next train to arrive at your station has very likely not even started moving yet.

Trips that have ended, meanwhile, simply disappear from the feed.

What are the challenges of this data format? Lots.

Each vehicle run in the system is assigned a trip_id, so in theory we should be able to assemble a list of relevant messages by parsing contiguous endpoint result. However, this proves to be more challenging than you would expect. The GTFS-Realtime format provides guarantees about the uniqueness of the trip_id at the time of the snapshot (the information would be pretty useless indeed if two different trains shared the same identifier!), but it provides no such guarantee across time.

From a narrative perspective, this has some pretty nasty consequences. What we think of as train trips (and what I purposefully call a train run here) may drop old IDs and acquire new ones at any time in their journey. Nor are the IDs fully unique. After a trip ends, that trip's ID is released back into a common pool, immediately available for assignment to any newly scheduled trips.

Feeds are occasionally returned in a corrupted state. This will happen anywhere on the Internet, but seems to be especially common with the MTA feed. The speculation online is that it's because there's a file on a server somewhere that get read from (when a request comes in) and written to (when an update comes in) simultaneously.

Sometimes the MTA serves an incomplete feed that, albeit not corrupted, also doesn't actually include every trip being made. This occurs due to failures further down the wire. Unsurprisingly, it happens more often to the newer feeds. Sometimes the amount of trains that drop out is huge. In one twelve-hour period, for example, I saw fewer than a hundred stops on the J and Z, compared to thousands on all the other feeds. Garbage in, garbage out.

Sometimes the endpoint stops working completely. This has two flavors. In the first flavor, connections to the endpoint fail or time out. In the second flavor, the endpoint appears to continue to returns feeds...but the feed it returns is the same as the last good feed! It can take the MTA hours to days to detect and fix this when it happens.

There are data integrity issues with the messages themselves. I've found that the MTA occasionally returns vehicle updates without an associated trip update. I've also seen cases where the MTA returns trip updates or vehicle updates with an empty string ("") for the trip_id. Throw these record out!

Recall that in the trip update message, every stop besides the first and last will have an arrival time and a departure time if that stop is to be stopped at, and solely a departure time if that stop is to be skipped. The last stop will only have an arrival time. The first stop may have both, or only a departure time, depending on the state of the vehicle at write time. Sometimes though a message will come through with intermediate stops missing arrival or departure fields, or an end-stop with a departure time (to Hogwarts maybe), or a first stop with only an arrival time.

It would have been very helpful to have this all written down ahead of time. Well, now it is.

Buiding a tripifier

The complexity of the realtime feed, the rather overwhelming list of things that could go wrong, and lack of prior knowledge on my part precluded refactoring the data into a historical record (what I call a "logbook") right away. The module I wrote, called gtfs-tripifiy, instead approaches the problem in three steps. In the first, it transforms the data from its rather inconsistent native state into a Python dict. In the second, these feeds are transformed into what I call action logs: packets of tables recording the essential facts about each bit of information in the raw feed. Only in the last step does the data get clobbered into something historical.

To understand what the challenge is, imagine your favorite GTFS-Realtime stream as a matrix. On the x axis is time; on the y, the list of unique trip ids. Each entry is the information on that trip contained in the corresponding snapshot.

Because the MTA reuses the trip_id there might be another 2 going along with the same ID from 2:06 PM to 2:31 PM, and another from 5:45 PM to 6:37 PM, and so on. In other words, there are three contiguous "strides" of entries with the given ID. These are obviously three separate trips, so our first task is to divide them apart (and name them by computing a unique_trip_id). OK done.

Once we have snapshots collated, the information contained in the snapshots are easily comprehensible as simple word problems. For example:

Suppose that at time T there is an uptown 2 train stopped at station A. The train is next planning to go to stations B, C, and D.

At time T+1, that train is now stopped at station C. The train is next planning to go to station D.

What do we know about the route the train took?

Ready? Here's the solution.

At some time between the end of the Big Bang and time T the uptown 2 train stopped at station A. At some time between times T and T+1, the train either stopped at or skipped station B. It then stopped at station C.

Turning a stream of GTFS-Realtime snapshots into a train arrival history boils down to solving word problems like this one over and over and over again (but with a computer processor).

Notice that we don't know for sure whether or not the train actually stopped at station B. We can infer from the fact that it was scheduled to do so that it did, but that's it. This is a major limitation of building history on the back of snapshot data: it's often impossible to know whether or not a stop actually occurred.

Here's a harder word problem:

Suppose that at time T there is an uptown 2 train en route to station A. The train is planning to go to stations B, C, and D next.

At time T+1, the train is now stopped at station A. It is planning to go to stations E, F, G, B, C, D next.

At time T+2 the train is now stopped at station B. It is planning to go to stations C and D next.

And the solution:

Sometime between times T and T+1 the train stopped at station A. Sometime between times T+1 and T+2 the train stopped or skipped stations E, F, and G, and then stopped at station B.

Because the train moved, we can't naively determine whether or not the intervening stops at E, F, or G actually occurred. Those stops could have disappeared because they were dropped from the trip, or they could have disappeared because the train already made those stops. In the end we must contend with a limitation in the data: these are two very different outcomes, but they look the same to us.

Finally, recall from our earlier discussion on the data format that in the GTFS-Realtime feed, trips does not correspond one-to-one with end-to-end train runs. A single end-to-end service run may be "broken up" over time into several trips, each containing information about one leg of the overall run. I found that, in practice, the MTA only reports around half of train service run as end-to-end trips—the rest are reported in two (or more!) pieces.

Once we have handled reading, aligning, and "solving" the streams, there are only a few less interesting problems to solve. I had to "cap off" stops for trips that have ended, provision EN_ROUTE_TO codes for trips that were still en route at the time the feed ended (while the MTA is a 24/7 system, our data is not boundless). And I had to write a couple of utility functions for cleaning out incomplete records (the data on trips that appear in the first or last feed we read into a logbook are unlikely to be complete).


I did all this work so that you don't have to. And because I was really stubborn. OK maybe more of the latter.

The end result is the gtfs-tripify Python module. gtfs-tripify can be used to turn a list of GTFS-Realtime messages into a history of train arrivals and departures. Here's a minimal example of it in action:

# Load GTFS-Realtime feeds. I use archived MTA data and the requests library
import requests
response1 = requests.get('')
response2 = requests.get('')
response3 = requests.get('')

# Load a GTFS-Realtime parser. I use the default, pip-installable Google API.
from google.transit import gtfs_realtime_pb2
feed1 = gtfs_realtime_pb2.FeedMessage()
feed2 = gtfs_realtime_pb2.FeedMessage()
feed3 = gtfs_realtime_pb2.FeedMessage()

# Now the magic...
import gtfs_tripify as gt
feeds = [gt.dictify(feed) for feed in [feed1, feed2, feed3]]
logbook = gt.logify(feeds)
# Done!

The output is a dictionary of tables. The dictionary, what I call a "logbook", is keyed by a unique trip ID. The whole assemblage looks something like this:

    '047850_2..S05R_0': pandas.DataFrame,
    '051350_2..N01R_0': pandas.DataFrame,

Entries are tables describing individual trips. I call them "logs". An example:

          trip_id route_id              action minimum_time maximum_time  \
0  047850_2..S05R        2  STOPPED_OR_SKIPPED   1410960621   1410961221
1  047850_2..S05R        2  STOPPED_OR_SKIPPED   1410960621   1410961221
2  047850_2..S05R        2          STOPPED_AT   1410960621          nan

  stop_id latest_information_time
0    238S              1410961221
1    239S              1410961221
2    241S              1410961221

To get started using the module, read the Quickstart section of the documentation.

I'm currently working on a consumer web-app, which I'm calling the Subway Explorer, to surface this data in an end-user friendly manner. I'll have more to say on this subject soon!

— Aleksey